Photographic and Video Evidence
PHOTOGRAPHIC AND VIDEO EVIDENCE
They say one picture is worth a thousand words. Can anyone really argue with that expression when so much of what we seek to discover can be established and proven with a single piece of photographic evidence or surveillance video image?
Images Help Tell The Story
Few things can tell a story better than a compelling photograph. An image can help the viewer understand circumstances relevant to the scene of a crime. A surveillance video can provide irrefutable evidence of an individual’s actions and conduct.
And these days, the expression ‘unless I have a picture it didn’t really happen’ also has currency – it’s as though only by seeing photographic proof of an event can one truly appreciate the event it depicts. One thing hasn’t changed: producing a well-timed photograph or compelling video in court still has tremendous impact.
A qualified private investigator equipped with the latest surveillance video technology has the ability to show the facts beyond the shadow of a doubt. No wonder then that the goal of a field investigator — whether using SLR cameras with a wide array of lenses or the latest in digital video technology – is to capture the photographic evidence in visual form.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE IS VALUABLE
Sloppy handling or an investigator’s inexperience can rob your pictures of their legal value. The body of laws in Canada governing the admissibility of photographic evidence and videos is broad and ever-evolving; however what never changes is the importance of properly managing photographic evidence to ensure it remains relevant and admissible. Perhaps because images are so powerful, the law is strict when it comes to surveillance video and photographic evidence. It must be carefully handled, carefully managed, and properly stored in order to ensure that it remains valid and relevant during the court process.
- The admissibility of photographic evidence is governed by such questions as when the image was captured and by whom?
- Who had care and custody of the image or surveillance video between the time it was obtained and its presentation in court?
- Was an image edited or altered in any way between the time it was obtained and the time it was presented in court?
- Was the image enhanced in any way and if so, when and why?
- If enhanced, how was it done and can the effect be repeated?
- Has the enhanced image been further altered since the time of its enhancement?
The answer to these questions can impact the admissibility of photographic evidence and therefore, cast doubt on the images themselves. That’s why the photographic experts at Franco Investigation Services are trained and uniquely qualified to help ensure photographic evidence is securely and reliably managed and stored. Modern technology has provided an incredible number of options and levels of flexibility and yet the same basic guidelines regarding presentation and continuity of evidence remain, whether the image has been taken through traditional means or via one of the many covert methods available.
Our range of photographic and video equipment, both traditional and covert, provides us with an almost unparalleled opportunity to document investigative activity and allow clients to see and feel the events as they occurred.
Let us show you what decades of experience can do for you.